April 28th, 2012
Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film? 
IMAX’s Greg Foster seemed to like the idea of relaxing the absolute ban on phone use in theaters. His 17-year-old son “constantly has his phone with him,” he says. “We want them to pay $12 to $14 to come into an auditorium and watch a movie. But they’ve become accustomed to controlling their own existence.” Banning cell phone use may make them “feel a little handcuffed.”
I can’t say that I’m thrilled that we’re at this juncture in filmgoing, but it’s a discussion that needs to be had.  First of all, if Greg Foster’s son compulsively checks his phone, it means that his son has little sense of agency - the phone is controlling his existence.  That’s the larger issue at play.  I don’t think it is a teenage thing either.  I have gone to films with fellow filmmakers in their late 20s and have seen them respond to non-urgent texts during a film.
Classical music venues have been facing issues such as these for decades.  As the audience ages, they wonder how to bring younger people to listen to pieces by Bach, Mozart, Ligeti, and Glass.  They discuss amplification, allowing or encouraging audience participation, and relaxing the dress code.
I suppose I’m not concerned about these issues.  The etiquette will work itself out.  I know what I like, however.  I like to focus on beautiful pieces of music.  I love to dive into a great film.  I want to engage a piece of art and not concern myself about what I have to do later, who I should be texting etc… In other words, I enjoy handing myself over to something else.  I honestly feel bad for those people that can’t relax and go a few hours without checking their phone.  
In the end, it’s simply a matter of education and experience.  Telling people NOT to do something only encourages it.  Showing them the joys of contemplation, focus, and engagement will do more to combat the compulsions of the Distracted Generation more than any rule possibly could.
It reminds me of this book by Eric Siblin, a pop and rock music critic that discovered Bach later in life.  Like so many others that are not raised knowing the joy of Bach’s work, once he was formally introduced and really understood how to listen to the music, he was enchanted.  So much so that he switched gears entirely and wrote a beautiful biography of this experience called The Cello Suites: J. S. Bach, Pablo Casals, and the Search for a Baroque Masterpiece.
This is incredibly common.  People ignore Bach because they don’t understand it. People text because it is habitual.  If you want people not to text in a theater, simply show them how liberating it can be to free yourself from this compulsion.  Rules are made to be broken.  Habits are too.
~ü
[Image: The Invisible Cinema designed by Peter Kubelka]
[Quote: David Lieberman, Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film?: CinemaCon]

Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film? 

IMAX’s Greg Foster seemed to like the idea of relaxing the absolute ban on phone use in theaters. His 17-year-old son “constantly has his phone with him,” he says. “We want them to pay $12 to $14 to come into an auditorium and watch a movie. But they’ve become accustomed to controlling their own existence.” Banning cell phone use may make them “feel a little handcuffed.”

I can’t say that I’m thrilled that we’re at this juncture in filmgoing, but it’s a discussion that needs to be had.  First of all, if Greg Foster’s son compulsively checks his phone, it means that his son has little sense of agency - the phone is controlling his existence.  That’s the larger issue at play.  I don’t think it is a teenage thing either.  I have gone to films with fellow filmmakers in their late 20s and have seen them respond to non-urgent texts during a film.

Classical music venues have been facing issues such as these for decades.  As the audience ages, they wonder how to bring younger people to listen to pieces by Bach, Mozart, Ligeti, and Glass.  They discuss amplification, allowing or encouraging audience participation, and relaxing the dress code.

I suppose I’m not concerned about these issues.  The etiquette will work itself out.  I know what I like, however.  I like to focus on beautiful pieces of music.  I love to dive into a great film.  I want to engage a piece of art and not concern myself about what I have to do later, who I should be texting etc… In other words, I enjoy handing myself over to something else.  I honestly feel bad for those people that can’t relax and go a few hours without checking their phone.  

In the end, it’s simply a matter of education and experience.  Telling people NOT to do something only encourages it.  Showing them the joys of contemplation, focus, and engagement will do more to combat the compulsions of the Distracted Generation more than any rule possibly could.

It reminds me of this book by Eric Siblin, a pop and rock music critic that discovered Bach later in life.  Like so many others that are not raised knowing the joy of Bach’s work, once he was formally introduced and really understood how to listen to the music, he was enchanted.  So much so that he switched gears entirely and wrote a beautiful biography of this experience called The Cello Suites: J. S. Bach, Pablo Casals, and the Search for a Baroque Masterpiece.

This is incredibly common.  People ignore Bach because they don’t understand it. People text because it is habitual.  If you want people not to text in a theater, simply show them how liberating it can be to free yourself from this compulsion.  Rules are made to be broken.  Habits are too.

[Image: The Invisible Cinema designed by Peter Kubelka]

[Quote: David Lieberman, Is It Time To Let Moviegoers Send Texts During A Film?: CinemaCon]

April 17th, 2012
February 16th, 2012

What does an Oscar and an A-list celebrity get you?

Not much, apparently.  Chuck Tryon describes his amusing experience trying to rent the Matt Damon-narrated, Oscar-winning feature film Inside Job:

But after Ferguson’s powerful Oscar acceptance speech, in which he reminded us that not a single financial executive had gone to jail for his or her responsibility in the financial meltdown, the film seemed to disappear. For that reason alone, I was glad that MoveOn picked it up as a part of its house party series. It’s worth noting that the current home video ecosystem likely contributes to that. The documentary was distributed by Sony Pictures Classics and through Sony’s Home Entertainment division, and (because of that?) it is currently unavailable for streaming on Netflix. None of the Blockbuster Video stores in the area had the movie available for rental. And when I called one local video store to ask for Inside Job, the clerk stepped briefly away from the phone, came back and gruffly asked, “do you want the adult version?” The movie was also unavailable through Redbox kiosks, which ultimately meant that we had to purchase a copy for our house party. I don’t think this is a specific “conspiracy,” just that our current distribution model provides much greater potential for independent and low-budget films to “disappear” from public consciousness and even easy (or at least inexpensive) access. As a result, even hosting a screening now seems like a valuable contribution to the wider political discussion.

That is the sad state of domestic distribution in the United States.  The only reason Ferguson’s documentary remains at all relevant is because it inspires conversation.  Whatever you make, make sure it inspires conversation.

January 12th, 2012

I agree with what George Lucas is saying in this interview.

However, he is part of the problem, not the solution.  For decades he has sat on his franchise doing little to encourage alternative views and voices.  Now that he has had to put his own money in to a film - something that we independent filmmakers do year after year because distribution and exhibition is structured to keep us out - he decries the racism and lack of imagination in the industry.  Sorry George, you had 20 years to invest in the growth of cinema and instead you simply got fat off of the same funding channels that you’re now showing disdain for.  

[Video: George Lucas on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart]

December 6th, 2011
Ben Sachs profiles an aspect of filmmaking and exhibition that is little noted: mom & pop shops that sell region-free DVD players so that people are free from the shackles of domestic distribution.  As he points out:
As any fan of world cinema will concur, you can’t be long without a region-free player before you feel like you’re missing out on a lot of important stuff. There are too many great films that remain without official DVD distribution in this country—and not just foreign titles, but American masterpieces like Orson Welles’s Magnificent Ambersons and Chimes at Midnight.
Locally owned electronic stores are a fading as fast as local video stores.  These are important links in the chain of filmmaking that provide a curated alternative based on the needs of the local market.  For example, my favorite video store in Chicago, Odd Obsession, is an amazing resource for a filmmaker.  I recently rented Water and Power by Pat O’Neill - an experimental film that is usually only found in college and university archives.
The article points out something that never occurred to me, the playback of home movies.  From the interview:

BS: Are a lot of your customers buying DVD players to watch their wedding videos?
AM: A lot of them, yeah, because they get married in their home countries. They bring the DVDs over here and they find they can’t watch them. The DVD player they buy [in another store] isn’t multiregion.

And these, perhaps, are the rarest and most important movies of all.
~ü
[Image: Popular Electronics in Chicago, IL]

Ben Sachs profiles an aspect of filmmaking and exhibition that is little noted: mom & pop shops that sell region-free DVD players so that people are free from the shackles of domestic distribution.  As he points out:

As any fan of world cinema will concur, you can’t be long without a region-free player before you feel like you’re missing out on a lot of important stuff. There are too many great films that remain without official DVD distribution in this country—and not just foreign titles, but American masterpieces like Orson Welles’s Magnificent Ambersons and Chimes at Midnight.

Locally owned electronic stores are a fading as fast as local video stores.  These are important links in the chain of filmmaking that provide a curated alternative based on the needs of the local market.  For example, my favorite video store in Chicago, Odd Obsession, is an amazing resource for a filmmaker.  I recently rented Water and Power by Pat O’Neill - an experimental film that is usually only found in college and university archives.

The article points out something that never occurred to me, the playback of home movies.  From the interview:

BS: Are a lot of your customers buying DVD players to watch their wedding videos?

AM: A lot of them, yeah, because they get married in their home countries. They bring the DVDs over here and they find they can’t watch them. The DVD player they buy [in another store] isn’t multiregion.

And these, perhaps, are the rarest and most important movies of all.

[Image: Popular Electronics in Chicago, IL]

November 23rd, 2011

New 35mm movie projectors are no longer manufactured, for the simple reason that used projectors, some not very old, are flooding the market.

The reason for that is fairly disheartening. Some manufacturers of digital projectors required that existing film projectors must be removed from projection booths before their equipment could be installed. Why? No doubt there was some concocted technical excuse for their underlying reason, to slash and burn the competition. (The distracting gimmick of 3D was used to fuel this campaign.) A great many multiplexes are no longer capable of projecting the 35mm format that has served faithfully since about 1895. One film festival, having received its opening night film from overseas, found no theater in town that could exhibit it.

~ Roger Ebert on the sudden death of film
Loading tweets...

@dschmudde

Techniques for directing film. More than the script, bigger than the screen - the tangible and mystical characteristics of truly great filmmaking.